09 Jun 2011

Business waits for domestic arbitration reform

Doug Jones talks to BRR Media about the latest in reforms to Australia's arbitration laws.

Transcript

Business waits for domestic arbitration reform
Kate Ritchie, BRR Media
Doug Jones, Partner, Clayton Utz

Kate Ritchie
We're joined by Doug Jones who is the national head of the Projects Group at Clayton Utz. He is also the 2011 global president of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. Doug, thank you for joining us today on BRR Media.

Last year we saw reform to Australia's arbitration laws both at the international level and also for domestic arbitration with all the States agreeing that they would enact model laws covering domestic arbitration. What's the current state of reform in Australia?

Doug Jones
The only State in which the arbitration reform has been finally enacted is New South Wales but Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania are all in an advanced stage of passing the uniform legislation. Hopefully Queensland, Western Australia and the other States and Territories will shortly follow.

Kate Ritchie
Does this uneven rollout have implications for business, and what can businesses do to deal with this?

Doug Jones
I think care needs to be taken by business when deciding where it is going to arbitrate because at the moment, and until the uniform law is enacted in each of the States, there is a different legislative regime in some States to others. That can make a very significant difference to how an arbitration will be conducted. So I think business needs to be careful about choosing where it is arbitrating domestically in Australia.

The other thing that I think business can do is encourage government to get on with the uniform laws because it's unsatisfactory to have such a protracted rollout of a critical part of alternative dispute resolution legislation in the country.

Kate Ritchie
Finally, if we look at commercial arbitration, is it becoming an attractive alternative for domestic business who are looking to resolve their commercial disputes, or is there still a way to go? Is it going to be dependent on the rollout of the reform?

Doug Jones
The reforms are the first step in a process of reforming the practice of domestic arbitration in Australia. It has suffered in recent years from being too slow and too expensive and too close to the procedures adopted in the courts.

It's meant to be an alternative to court procedure and what the new uniform legislation does is enable arbitrators to ensure that the processes adopted in arbitration are different to court proceedings and offer an expeditious, fair and economical alternative for business.

That is a work in progress but hopefully will proceed with a fair amount of alacrity because there is a need for alternative processes to the court processes for business for a variety of reasons not least of which is confidentiality.

Kate Ritchie
Certainly, hopefully we do see commercial arbitration become a true alternative. Doug thank you for your insights today. Listeners if you have any questions for Doug send them through to djones@claytonutz.com

Related Knowledge

Get in Touch

Get in touch information is loading

Disclaimer

Clayton Utz communications are intended to provide commentary and general information. They should not be relied upon as legal advice. Formal legal advice should be sought in particular transactions or on matters of interest arising from this communication. Persons listed may not be admitted in all States and Territories.