predictions_760x300px

  PREDICTIONS FOR FY16 – HOW

   DID THEY PAN OUT?

   Predictions: What we predicted and what happened.

Consolidation

Prediction

We saw the start of M&A-led consolidation, which we considered would continue, if for no other reason than to build net present values and scale when necessary to access increasingly international markets. On a related issue, we predicted international funds (subject to FIRB approval) would exert greater control over operating assets.

Outcome

Consolidation across logistics, agribusiness and other sectors saw strong M&A activity. Activity was noticeably slower in the mining sector as capital invested into equity via debt swaps, taking advantage of the highly leveraged balance sheets of many mining and mining services enterprises.

Cultural Change

Prediction

We looked forward to boards embracing experienced turnaround specialists being brought into situations well before those entities became truly distressed.

Outcome

We have seen an upswing in the engagement of turnaround specialists in the last 12 months but, as with previous years, there is always more scope for boards and management to embrace an experienced turnaround practitioner at an early stage.

Funding Challenges

Prediction

We anticipated a continued increase in the issuance of alternative instruments, such as 144A bonds or Term B Loans, among domestic and international financiers. 

Outcome

We have seen our prediction play out. This is driven by interest rates remaining at historical lows, both domestically and in the United States, as well as continued downward pressure on the inner city residential property market. The residential property issues are threefold:

(a) an over-supply of new apartment blocks, particularly inner city apartments in Melbourne, Sydney and Brisbane;

(b) local defaults, by reason of the continued slowdown and an inability to make immediate profits by trading out of pre-sales;

(c) overseas defaults emanating mainly from China, by reason of (i) a reported increased preparedness to enforce capital outflow restrictions; (ii) a slowdown in its economy and (iii) local lenders' increased restrictions on lending to overseas buyers.

The reduced availability of debt has led to an increase in the use of alternative debt instruments.

Iron ore prices

Prediction

Forecasts for iron ore prices and a range of other commodities (except, perhaps non-coal energy) were subdued, and we forecast a gloomy start to FY16 for miners and their dependent contractors, transport operators, logistics owners, engineers, materials suppliers and service industries.  

Outcome

In the current climate, iron ore transactions are still finding it difficult to attract new investments as the primary export market for this product continues to be shaped by China's long-term growth outlook.

Prices were highly variable during the first half of 2016 for iron ore, staged a surprise rally in April 2016, then by 24 May 2016 went into a severe decline.  Despite the large movements in prices, the market fundamentals are broadly unchanged: demand growth is slow and the market remains well-supplied.

The fall in the price of iron ore over the past few years has had the effect that many operations globally are running at a cash loss, some of which are expected to close, though, at current prices, few of these operations will be in Australia, as it is dominated by the world’s largest and lowest cost operations.

Greece

Prediction

After defaulting on a 1.5 billion euro loan, Greece became the first country to default on its obligations to the IMF since Zimbabwe in 2001. A third bailout averted a crisis in the short term, but Greece's position remained precarious.

Outcome

We moved from a Grexit to a Brexit during the course of the last year.

The IMF finally concluded that Greece’s debt had become unsustainable and that country could not retrieve the situation on its own.  It was critical for medium- and long-term debt sustainability that Greece's European partners make concrete commitments to provide significant debt relief.

The Memorandum of Understanding that has emerged puts in place far-reaching policies to restore fiscal sustainability, financial sector stability and a return to sustainable growth.

Debt relief is now firmly on the agenda, but is dependent upon Greece sticking to the program targets. 

Whether Greece will be able to return to a sustainable fiscal and growth path is an interesting question, given the deep-seated cultural forces of populism, political extremism, and deterioration in the rule of law, combined with a fiscal, economic and banking crisis.

The regulatory space

Prediction

At the regulatory level, we expected to see continued agitation for the introduction of safe harbour defences for directors undertaking workouts, a continuation of the debate on whether an equivalent of Chapter 11 should be introduced into Australian law, and the deeming of ipso facto clauses as void once a company goes into administration or receivership.  

Outcome

The Productivity Commission's Final Report into Business Set-up, Transfer and Closure, released on 30 September 2015, called for reforms to the Corporations Act to:

  • deem "ipso facto" clauses void when a business is controlled by an administrator; and
  • introduce a "safe harbour" defence to allow directors of a solvent company to explore, within guidelines, restructuring options without liability for insolvent trading.
Following that report the Australian Government released a proposals paper, "Improving bankruptcy and insolvency laws", as part of its National Innovation and Science Agenda. It deals with both ipso facto clauses and the safe harbour defence.

Ipso facto clauses

The Government has advanced an "ipso facto model" which would make void any contractual term which terminates or amends a contract by reason only that an "insolvency event" has occurred. In this model an "insolvency event" would include:

  • an administrator having been appointed in respect of the company;
  • the company undertaking a scheme of arrangement for the purpose of avoiding administration or insolvent liquidation;
  • a receiver or controller being appointed; and
  • the company entering into a deed of company arrangement.

As an anti-avoidance mechanism, the Government proposed that "any provision in an agreement that has the effect of providing for, or permitting, anything that in substance is contrary [to the proposal] would be of no force or effect".  Counterparties would maintain a right to terminate, amend, accelerate or vary an agreement with the debtor company for any other reason, such as for a breach involving non-payment or non-performance.

As to exclusions, the Government intends to carve out certain “prescribed financial contracts” where uncertainty around the ability to enforce that type of contract represents a material risk to the efficiency, stability and liquidity of the capital markets which depend on them.

The Government also flagged its intention to include a provision that affected counterparties may apply to the court to vary contract terms if they can show they have suffered hardship.

Safe harbour for company directors

See chapter on the prospects of a safe harbour.

WE CAN HELP YOU
Contact Us icon_phone_white.png