Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights

3 November 2009

Welcome to the November edition of LDR Insights, in which we'll look at litigation funding post-Multiplex. What does the decision really mean for funders, and prospective and actual defendants?

Australia might have ridden out the worst of the global financial crisis, but the effects are likely to be felt for years to come, not least in the courts in the form of a wave of litigation. Who are the prospective defendants and can they protect themselves now?

We'll also look at Australia's likely accession to the Hague Service Convention, and why it's a good thing for Australian companies doing business with overseas entities.

Finally, if you're suing another for negligence, can you recover the costs of diverting your staff to deal with the consequences of the negligence? We'll examine the current state of the law in Australia on this important question.

Prudential regulation catches up with litigation funding

By Stuart Clark and Greg Williams.

Is the Multiplex decision the death-knell for litigation funding, or just a hiccup? Stuart Clark and Greg Williams examine the implications of the decision for class actions in Australia.

Plaintiffs queuing up to play the blame game post-GFC

By Peter Keel and Norman Lucas.

Peter Keel and Norman Lucas think that the fallout from the global financial crisis for many in the financial services world is just beginning, in the form of a wave of litigation. Who are the likely targets and what should they be doing now?

Australia to join Hague Service Convention

By Gina Elliott and David Hughes.

If you're suing someone in another country, how do you let them know it? Gina Elliott and David Hughes explain how Australia's accession to the Hague Service Convention will greatly simplify the service of court documents to overseas defendants.

Recovering damages for diversion of employees - Australia takes note of English decisions

By Fred Prickett and Peter Sise.

Your company suffers as a result of someone's negligence, and has to divert staff to deal with the consequences. Can you recover the cost of diverting your employees? Fred Prickett and Peter Sise examine how courts both here and abroad have dealt with the issue.