02 September 2005
Key Points:
Under the new Act, employers may not engage in "camera surveillance", "computer surveillance" or "surveillance" of employees. There are important exceptions with respect to the employer clearly, and in advance, notifying employees of what it is doing and any related policies of the employer.
The New South Wales Workplace Surveillance Act 2005 was passed on 23 June 2005. It will commence on proclamation. Regulations are currently being drafted and it is expected that it will commence shortly after finalisation of those regulations.
The Act restricts and regulates employers in relation to surveillance that can be carried out on their employees in the workplace.
Among other things, the Act:
A CSA can only be issued for the purpose of investigating unlawful activities of employees and not to monitor employee performance.
Types of surveillance
The Act applies only to the following definitions of surveillance:
Notified surveillance
Part 2 of the Act requires employers to notify employees of surveillance that will be carried out while the employee is at work (i.e. at the workplace, or any other place while working).
Surveillance of an employee is notified surveillance, and therefore allowed, if:
As with the existing Workplace Video Surveillance Act 1998 (NSW), which the Act will repeal, the Act prohibits surveillance of any change room, toilet facility or shower or other bathing facility at work. It also prohibits employers from undertaking surveillance using a surveillance device, such as a camera or video while the employee is not at work. However this prohibition does not extend to use of computer equipment form the employee's home when that equipment has been provided by the employer.
Section 18 restricts the use and disclosure of notified surveillance records to those relating to:
Covert surveillance
Part 4 of the Act will prohibit covert surveillance (which is anything that is not notified surveillance) by an employer of their employees at work, except as authorised by a CSA. Covert surveillance may only be carried out for the purpose of establishing whether or not an employee is involved in any unlawful activity at work.
Under section 22, an employer can defend a breach to the covert surveillance prohibition by proving that:
In order to conduct covert surveillance in their workplace, an employer must first obtain a CSA from a Magistrate under section 23. Any application to a Magistrate for a CSA is subject to 8 mandatory criteria including:
In considering an application for covert surveillance, a Magistrate must:
If a Magistrate refuses an application by an employer to issue, vary or cancel a CSA, the applicant can apply to the Industrial Relations Commission within 30 days of that Magistrate's decision. Similarly an employee can apply to the Commission to vary or cancel a CSA (section 41).
Reporting and disclosure requirements for covert surveillance
Under section 35 of the Act an employer must provide a report to the issuing Magistrate within 30 days of the expiry of the CSA specifying, among other things, the name of the employee who was the subject of the surveillance, the period of surveillance, details of the type of surveillance, details of any surveillance record and any reason why an employee who was the subject of the surveillance should not be informed of the surveillance.
Disclosure of covert surveillance records may be made for relevant purposes only; such as disclosure to a law enforcement agency for investigation of an offence or in disciplinary or legal proceedings against the employee (section 37).
The Act also regulates the storage of covert surveillance records by employers, employers' representatives and licensed security operators. Further, the Act provides for fines of up to $2200 per breach of the record storage provision (section 36).
Director's liabilities
Importantly, the Act contains a deeming provision with regard to an individual who is a director of a corporation or a person who is concerned in the management of a corporation.
If a director of a corporation, or a person concerned in the management of a corporation, knowingly authorises or permits a contravention of the legislation, then that person is capable of being prosecuted in his or her capacity as an individual.
Conclusion
Employers will need to implement policies and procedures relating to how surveillance of employees is conducted in the workplace, particularly email and internet policies. The importance of a comprehensive email and internet access policy being formulated by the employer cannot be underestimated, particularly in light of the prohibitions relating to the blocking of emails or internet access. Employers must ensure that employees are aware of and understand the policy so it is important the policy is easy to understand and is made readily available. Formal training in the application of the policy may be required.
The Bill explicitly prohibits the blocking of emails, whether sent or received, or the access to a website in relation to an employees rights to union representation. Employers will need to ensure that employees' access to their union via electronic means is not hindered in any way.
For further information, please contact Narelle Smythe.