18 July 2008
Key Points:
The Federal Government's Green Paper on the proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme promises the largest transformation of the Australian economy. While in many respects the Green Paper adopts design elements for the Scheme similar to those advocated by Professor Ross Garnaut, there are also some significant departures. The economic transformation will come at a price. What that price will be will not be known until later this year when the emissions cap and interim target will be revealed.
On Wednesday 16 July, Senator Penny Wong, the Minister for Climate Change, released the Government's widely anticipated Green Paper on the design of the proposed emissions trading scheme which will come into operation in Australia in 2010, the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme.
It sets out over its 516 pages the options which have been considered by the Government in respect of the various design elements of the Scheme including sectoral coverage, where in the supply chain the point of obligation will be imposed, the method of allocating permits and the contentious issue of compensation, particularly for the trade exposed emissions intensive and stationary energy sectors.
The Government has spent much of 2008 in extensive consultation with key stakeholders and the public generally on the design of the Scheme with the aim of releasing its White Paper on final Scheme design later this year. Despite this, the ambitious timetable that the Government has set to implement the Scheme suggests that the preferred options identified in the Green Paper will largely represent its key elements. This is likely to significantly influence the developing forward market for permits under the Scheme in advance of its commencement.
Key inputs into the Government's Green Paper, which we've previously commented on, were the Garnaut Climate Change Review's ETS Discussion Paper and most recently, its Draft Report. This is the first time that the Government has flagged its position in relation to some of the strong views expressed by Professor Ross Garnaut, such as his preference for full auctioning of permits, and denying compensation to the stationary energy sector, particularly, coal fired power stations, for any diminution in asset value.
Key design features
As part of its election policy, the Government committed to a 60% reduction in Australia's GHG emissions by 2050 and the implementation of an emissions trading scheme in Australia by 2010. This continues to represent the cornerstone of the Government's overall policy to respond to climate change. In the absence of any detailed design or analysis, the Government previously announced that the emissions trading scheme would be shaped by a number of key principles.
Those principles have set the framework for the Green Paper and explain many of the Government's preferred position on key design elements.
The key design elements of the Scheme are:
A table summarising in more detail the Government's preferred options in respect of the salient design features of the Scheme is here. The table contrasts these preferred positions with those advocated by Professor Garnaut in his Draft Report.
Conclusion
In many respects the Green Paper represents a balanced approach between the urgent need to reduce emission of greenhouse gases through broad sectoral coverage and early Scheme commencement, against the international uncertainty that presently exists regarding future emission commitments by both developed and developing countries post 2012.
By providing transitional assistance for TEEIIs and a price cap, the Government has sought to reduce price uncertainty for liable entities and thus foster broad cooperation for the introduction of the Scheme. In addition, by providing support for the coal-fired electricity generators, even if only a one-off, there is a recognition that Australia's energy security is presently guaranteed by our large coal reserves and existing energy infrastructure stock.
Ultimately, the making or unmaking of the Scheme will be the determined by the price that business and the broader community will be made to bear and that precise liability will not become clear for several months yet.
For further information, please contact Brendan Bateman.