<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>  <title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz | Telecommunications, Media and Technology - Publications]]></title>  <link>http://www.claytonutz.com/industry/telecommunications_media_and_technology/publications.page</link>  <description><![CDATA[Our Telecommunications, Media and Technology team advises on corporate and transactional issues in major mergers and acquisitions, content arrangements and IT outsourcing, intellectual property, commercial litigation and regulatory proceedings.  ]]></description>  <copyright><![CDATA[(c) Clayton Utz 2009]]></copyright>    <language>en-au</language> <item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201006/16/should_ticket_onselling_be_regulated_asks_new_issues_paper.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Should ticket onselling be regulated, asks new issues paper]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201006/16/should_ticket_onselling_be_regulated_asks_new_issues_paper.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Australian Government's Commonwealth Consumer Affairs Advisory Council is looking at whether ticket onselling, including scalping, should be regulated, says Chris McLeod.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201006/01/what_is_a_complaint_under_the_commercial_radio_codes_of_practice.page</guid><title><![CDATA[What is a complaint under the Commercial Radio Codes of Practice?]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201006/01/what_is_a_complaint_under_the_commercial_radio_codes_of_practice.page</link><description><![CDATA[A commercial radio licensee must act quickly when someone complains about a breach of the Codes of Practice - but what is a complaint? Mary Still and Kate Jordan look for answers in a recent case.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201005/05/new_bill_creates_satellite_services_to_fix_digital_tv_black_spots.page</guid><title><![CDATA[New bill creates satellite services to fix digital TV black spots]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201005/05/new_bill_creates_satellite_services_to_fix_digital_tv_black_spots.page</link><description><![CDATA[Australians living in digital TV black spots will be served by new satellite services to be established by a new Broadcasting Bill. Mary Still and Joshua Barwick look at what's in store.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201003/04/media_and_communications_sector_reform_means_industry_leadership_critical.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Media and communications sector reform means industry leadership critical]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201003/04/media_and_communications_sector_reform_means_industry_leadership_critical.page</link><description><![CDATA[The central role of media and communications in Australian society and the economy and the pace of technological change in these sectors means there will be an even greater need in the future for leadership in industry education, regulatory policy debate and legal reform, according to Clayton Utz partner Caroline Lovell.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201002/26/government_seeks_comment_on_national_broadband_network_company_draft_laws.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Government seeks comment on National Broadband Network Company draft laws]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201002/26/government_seeks_comment_on_national_broadband_network_company_draft_laws.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Federal Government has released exposure drafts of legislation for the ownership and governance of the National Broadband Network Company (NBN Co) and access to the wholesale services it will provide.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200910/13/historic_reforms_to_telecommunications_regulation.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Historic reforms to telecommunications regulation]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200910/13/historic_reforms_to_telecommunications_regulation.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2009 is aimed at Telstra's vertical and horizontal integration, streamlining the access and anti-competitive conduct regimes, and consumer safeguards.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200909/17/review_of_anti-siphoning_regime_announced.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Review of anti-siphoning regime announced]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200909/17/review_of_anti-siphoning_regime_announced.page</link><description><![CDATA[On 20 August 2009 the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy released a discussion paper for its review of the Australian anti-siphoning regime under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth) (BSA), Sport on television: A review of the anti-siphoning scheme in the contemporary digital environment .]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20080630/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20080630/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Tricks of the trade (and how not to get trapped) - intellectual property and government grants; A new meaning of consequential loss in technology contracts; Controlling copyright created in the workplace; Trade mark infringement - who can provide consent?; Use it or lose it!; Patents and the financial services industry - show me the money!;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200802/12/federal_court_opens_door_to_more_parallel_importing.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Federal Court opens door to more parallel importing]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200802/12/federal_court_opens_door_to_more_parallel_importing.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Federal Court has dealt a blow to businesses seeking use copyright law to prevent the parallel importation of their goods.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200709/04/can_you_patent_a_building_you_can_bet_your_house_on_it.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Can you patent a building? You can bet your house on it!]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200709/04/can_you_patent_a_building_you_can_bet_your_house_on_it.page</link><description><![CDATA[The architectural, building and construction industries generate a tremendous amount of intellectual property, much of which is protected by copyright. Should you be looking to patent law too? In the right circumstances, say Nicholas Tyacke and Anurag Verma, a patent could be the solution.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20061215/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20061215/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: So where the bloody hell are you online?; Bad news for Google News; It's good governance - Don't overstate the commercial significance of your IP; Opposing or revoking a trade mark - important changes; Business method patents - does your invention have a physical effect or consequence?; Infringing a design: it might not be obvious, but it could be fraudulent; Technological protection measures and circumvention devices - will new laws solve the problem?;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20060719/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20060719/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Lara Bingle sues men's magazine - protecting personality rights in Australia; It's patently not obvious to an Aussie Rules coach; Domain names and trade marks: Words of caution from the UK High Court; Review of technological protection measures exceptions: is there an easier way?; When is a licence agreement a franchise agreement?; Name the wrong inventors, lose your patent; Shakeup in evidence preparation for patent oppositions; Trade marks and the issue of bad faith in "non-use applications": who bears the burden of proof?; Summary judgment in Australian IP cases;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/24/australian_copyright_law_changes.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Australian Copyright Law Changes]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/24/australian_copyright_law_changes.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Australian Government has this week announced reforms which are to be implemented to make Australian copyright laws "fairer for users" and "tougher on pirates". A draft exposure Bill implementing the changes is to be circulated in the near future. The proposed reforms follow on from obligations imposed on the Australian Government in accordance with the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/08/clayton_utz_partner_takes_on_top_ipba_role.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz partner takes on top IPBA role]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/08/clayton_utz_partner_takes_on_top_ipba_role.page</link><description><![CDATA[Clayton Utz partner Jim FitzSimons has officially stepped into his new role of President of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association following the association's 16th annual conference, which Mr FitzSimons describes as having been an outstanding success.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200603/17/media_law_changes-cutting_to_the_chase.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Media law changes - cutting to the chase]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200603/17/media_law_changes-cutting_to_the_chase.page</link><description><![CDATA[What is the status of Tuesday's statement by Senator Coonan? It's a discussion paper, rather than a policy statement. The fact that the paper is open for discussion until 18 April may make it look as though the Government isn't expecting to make many changes to the proposals in the paper. However, some of those proposals are still very much "up in the air", which indicates that the Government has left itself plenty of wriggle room.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20051214/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20051214/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The Block is no Dream Home - copyright and television program formats; Does your invention "benefit Australian society as a whole" - a new test for patentability; Who owns the IP devised by a company director?; Experimenting at your peril?; A case of software "look and feel"; Crown copyright &#8220; an uncertain future; GITC version 5 - Government ICT contracting in Queensland moves to a new age;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/media_and_telecommunications_insights/20050913/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Media and Telecommunications Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/media_and_telecommunications_insights/20050913/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The spectacle of the debate;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050902/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050902/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: When linking is infringing: the MP3s4FREE case; Was Grokster really a victory for the entertainment industry?; New Act controls workplace surveillance; Is publishing a website "doing business in Australia"?; Court says "cheese" to TV cameras - but are we any the wiser?; Copyright and implied licences - when do they arise?; Do exclusion clauses work?;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050509/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050509/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Big changes to ownership of sound recordings and performers' rights; Can offering products on a foreign website infringe Australian trade marks?; Who wants to be a patentee?; Update on Madrid Protocol; You paid for it - but do you own it, and can you protect your investment?;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/media_insights/20050323/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Media Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/media_insights/20050323/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Making sense of the year ahead; In the news;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040914/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040914/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The FTA's impact on generic pharmaceuticals and the PBS: Much ado about nothing?; FTA shakes up copyright law; IP, tax planning, and the Uniform Capital Allowances System; Some sanity returns to IT disputes?; Australian DVD pirate gaoled; APRA's draft Prudential Standard on business continuity management for ADIs and insurers;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040610/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040610/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The legality of internet pop-up ads; Harry Potter and the Order of the Federal Court; Draft standard on corporate governance and information and communication technology; How well does our patent regime protect business systems?; Be fair, bugs in software are just defects; Crown ownership of copyright under review; Internet search engines, advertising and trade marks - update; Profile: Paul Armarego;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/FTAReport_2.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[Free Trade Agreement Report]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/FTAReport_2.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Australia and the United States of America completed negotiations to enter into their Free Trade Agreement on 8 February 2004 and signed it on 18 May. This is our initial analytical overview.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040312/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040312/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: New dawn for Australia&#8482;s registered designs laws; Fixing the copyright/design overlap?; &#339;Shiver Me Timbers! still infringes; Internet search engines, advertising and trade marks; Unique aspects of IT PPP projects; Quick bytes; Foreign language marks and deceptive similarity;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>