<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>  <title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz | Telecommunications, Media and Technology - Publications]]></title>  <link>http://www.claytonutz.com/area_of_law/telecommunications_media_and_technology/publications.page</link>  <description/>  <copyright><![CDATA[(c) Clayton Utz 2009]]></copyright>    <language>en-au</language> <item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201007/07/youtube_finds_safe_harbour_in_viacom_copyright_case.page</guid><title><![CDATA[YouTube finds safe harbour in Viacom copyright case]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201007/07/youtube_finds_safe_harbour_in_viacom_copyright_case.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Viacom v YouTube case is an important one on the liability of service providers for their users' copyright infringement, as Mary Still explains.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201006/16/should_ticket_onselling_be_regulated_asks_new_issues_paper.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Should ticket onselling be regulated, asks new issues paper]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201006/16/should_ticket_onselling_be_regulated_asks_new_issues_paper.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Australian Government's Commonwealth Consumer Affairs Advisory Council is looking at whether ticket onselling, including scalping, should be regulated, says Chris McLeod.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201006/01/what_is_a_complaint_under_the_commercial_radio_codes_of_practice.page</guid><title><![CDATA[What is a complaint under the Commercial Radio Codes of Practice?]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201006/01/what_is_a_complaint_under_the_commercial_radio_codes_of_practice.page</link><description><![CDATA[A commercial radio licensee must act quickly when someone complains about a breach of the Codes of Practice - but what is a complaint? Mary Still and Kate Jordan look for answers in a recent case.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201005/05/new_bill_creates_satellite_services_to_fix_digital_tv_black_spots.page</guid><title><![CDATA[New bill creates satellite services to fix digital TV black spots]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201005/05/new_bill_creates_satellite_services_to_fix_digital_tv_black_spots.page</link><description><![CDATA[Australians living in digital TV black spots will be served by new satellite services to be established by a new Broadcasting Bill. Mary Still and Joshua Barwick look at what's in store.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201003/04/media_and_communications_sector_reform_means_industry_leadership_critical.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Media and communications sector reform means industry leadership critical]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201003/04/media_and_communications_sector_reform_means_industry_leadership_critical.page</link><description><![CDATA[The central role of media and communications in Australian society and the economy and the pace of technological change in these sectors means there will be an even greater need in the future for leadership in industry education, regulatory policy debate and legal reform, according to Clayton Utz partner Caroline Lovell.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201002/26/government_seeks_comment_on_national_broadband_network_company_draft_laws.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Government seeks comment on National Broadband Network Company draft laws]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201002/26/government_seeks_comment_on_national_broadband_network_company_draft_laws.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Federal Government has released exposure drafts of legislation for the ownership and governance of the National Broadband Network Company (NBN Co) and access to the wholesale services it will provide.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200910/13/historic_reforms_to_telecommunications_regulation.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Historic reforms to telecommunications regulation]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200910/13/historic_reforms_to_telecommunications_regulation.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Telecommunications Legislation Amendment (Competition and Consumer Safeguards) Bill 2009 is aimed at Telstra's vertical and horizontal integration, streamlining the access and anti-competitive conduct regimes, and consumer safeguards.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200909/17/review_of_anti-siphoning_regime_announced.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Review of anti-siphoning regime announced]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200909/17/review_of_anti-siphoning_regime_announced.page</link><description><![CDATA[On 20 August 2009 the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy released a discussion paper for its review of the Australian anti-siphoning regime under the Broadcasting Services Act 1992 (Cth) (BSA), Sport on television: A review of the anti-siphoning scheme in the contemporary digital environment .]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200812/04/tm_infringement-government_review_of_penalties_and_additional_damages.page</guid><title><![CDATA[TM infringement - Government Review of Penalties and Additional Damages]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200812/04/tm_infringement-government_review_of_penalties_and_additional_damages.page</link><description><![CDATA[Four and a half years ago, the Advisory Council on Intellectual Property conducted a Review of Trade Mark Enforcement, which suggested that penalties for trade mark infringement should be reviewed.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200810/30/clayton_utz_succeeds_in_first_australian_court_decisions_on_infringement_under_the_designs_act_2003.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz succeeds in first Australian court decisions on infringement under the Designs Act 2003]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200810/30/clayton_utz_succeeds_in_first_australian_court_decisions_on_infringement_under_the_designs_act_2003.page</link><description><![CDATA[In Review 2 Pty Ltd v Redberry Enterprise Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1588 (24 October 2008) and Review Australia Pty Ltd v New Cover Group Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1589 (24 October 2008), the Federal Court has delivered the first judicial decisions on infringement under the Designs Act 2003 (Cth). Until now, there have been no decisions that found it necessary to apply the test for design infringement under the new Designs Act.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20080630/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20080630/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Tricks of the trade (and how not to get trapped) - intellectual property and government grants; A new meaning of consequential loss in technology contracts; Controlling copyright created in the workplace; Trade mark infringement - who can provide consent?; Use it or lose it!; Patents and the financial services industry - show me the money!;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200802/25/knock-off_designs_can_hurt_your_reputation-can_you_be_compensated.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Knock-off designs can hurt your reputation - can you be compensated?]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200802/25/knock-off_designs_can_hurt_your_reputation-can_you_be_compensated.page</link><description><![CDATA[In Review Australia Pty Ltd v Innovative Lifestyle Investments Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 74 (15 February 2008), the Federal Court has opened up the types of damages that can be awarded for the infringement of a registered design. Review is a fashion house with an asserted reputation for originality. Importantly, it also registers some of its designs.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200802/12/federal_court_opens_door_to_more_parallel_importing.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Federal Court opens door to more parallel importing]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200802/12/federal_court_opens_door_to_more_parallel_importing.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Federal Court has dealt a blow to businesses seeking use copyright law to prevent the parallel importation of their goods.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200710/24/amendments_to_the_franchising_code_what_do_they_mean_for_you.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Amendments to the Franchising Code: what do they mean for you?]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200710/24/amendments_to_the_franchising_code_what_do_they_mean_for_you.page</link><description><![CDATA[On 6 February 2007, Fran Bailey (Federal Minister for Tourism and Small Business) announced the Federal Government's response to a review conducted last year in relation to the disclosure provisions of the Franchising Code of Conduct. After a series of consultations with interested parties (including Clayton Utz and the Franchise Council of Australia), amendments have now been made to the Code. These amendments take effect from 1 March 2008.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200709/20/the_shape_of_things_to_come_product_design_protection_and_the_need_for_artistic_inspiration.page</guid><title><![CDATA[The shape of things to come: Product design protection and the need for artistic inspiration]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200709/20/the_shape_of_things_to_come_product_design_protection_and_the_need_for_artistic_inspiration.page</link><description><![CDATA[The decision provides a timely reminder for manufacturers to think about these issues and whether there is a need to register their product's design.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200709/04/can_you_patent_a_building_you_can_bet_your_house_on_it.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Can you patent a building? You can bet your house on it!]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200709/04/can_you_patent_a_building_you_can_bet_your_house_on_it.page</link><description><![CDATA[The architectural, building and construction industries generate a tremendous amount of intellectual property, much of which is protected by copyright. Should you be looking to patent law too? In the right circumstances, say Nicholas Tyacke and Anurag Verma, a patent could be the solution.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20061215/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20061215/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: So where the bloody hell are you online?; Bad news for Google News; It's good governance - Don't overstate the commercial significance of your IP; Opposing or revoking a trade mark - important changes; Business method patents - does your invention have a physical effect or consequence?; Infringing a design: it might not be obvious, but it could be fraudulent; Technological protection measures and circumvention devices - will new laws solve the problem?;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20060719/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20060719/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Lara Bingle sues men's magazine - protecting personality rights in Australia; It's patently not obvious to an Aussie Rules coach; Domain names and trade marks: Words of caution from the UK High Court; Review of technological protection measures exceptions: is there an easier way?; When is a licence agreement a franchise agreement?; Name the wrong inventors, lose your patent; Shakeup in evidence preparation for patent oppositions; Trade marks and the issue of bad faith in "non-use applications": who bears the burden of proof?; Summary judgment in Australian IP cases;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200607/17/is_the_devil_in_the_detail_for_australias_new_media_framework.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Is the devil in the detail for Australia's new media framework?]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200607/17/is_the_devil_in_the_detail_for_australias_new_media_framework.page</link><description><![CDATA[On 13 July 2006 the Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts announced that Cabinet had backed her plans for reform of the media industry.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/24/australian_copyright_law_changes.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Australian Copyright Law Changes]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/24/australian_copyright_law_changes.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Australian Government has this week announced reforms which are to be implemented to make Australian copyright laws "fairer for users" and "tougher on pirates". A draft exposure Bill implementing the changes is to be circulated in the near future. The proposed reforms follow on from obligations imposed on the Australian Government in accordance with the Australia-US Free Trade Agreement.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/17/protecting_brands_a_matter_of_using_or_losing.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Protecting brands a matter of using or losing]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/17/protecting_brands_a_matter_of_using_or_losing.page</link><description><![CDATA["Use it or lose it" - that's the message a leading IP lawyer has for businesses that believe trade mark registrations alone are enough to protect their valuable brands.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/08/clayton_utz_partner_takes_on_top_ipba_role.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz partner takes on top IPBA role]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/08/clayton_utz_partner_takes_on_top_ipba_role.page</link><description><![CDATA[Clayton Utz partner Jim FitzSimons has officially stepped into his new role of President of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association following the association's 16th annual conference, which Mr FitzSimons describes as having been an outstanding success.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200604/06/significant_changes_proposed_to_australian_patent_law.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Significant changes proposed to Australian patent law]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200604/06/significant_changes_proposed_to_australian_patent_law.page</link><description><![CDATA[In the last week of March 2006, the Federal Government introduced the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill 2006 into Parliament. As its title suggests, the Bill proposed changes to a number of areas of intellectual property law. The most significant of the proposed changes relate to Australian patent law, and it is these changes which are the focus of this alert.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20051214/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20051214/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The Block is no Dream Home - copyright and television program formats; Does your invention "benefit Australian society as a whole" - a new test for patentability; Who owns the IP devised by a company director?; Experimenting at your peril?; A case of software "look and feel"; Crown copyright &#8220; an uncertain future; GITC version 5 - Government ICT contracting in Queensland moves to a new age;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/media_and_telecommunications_insights/20050913/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Media and Telecommunications Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/media_and_telecommunications_insights/20050913/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The spectacle of the debate;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050902/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050902/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: When linking is infringing: the MP3s4FREE case; Was Grokster really a victory for the entertainment industry?; New Act controls workplace surveillance; Is publishing a website "doing business in Australia"?; Court says "cheese" to TV cameras - but are we any the wiser?; Copyright and implied licences - when do they arise?; Do exclusion clauses work?;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050509/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050509/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Big changes to ownership of sound recordings and performers' rights; Can offering products on a foreign website infringe Australian trade marks?; Who wants to be a patentee?; Update on Madrid Protocol; You paid for it - but do you own it, and can you protect your investment?;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/media_insights/20050323/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Media Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/media_insights/20050323/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Making sense of the year ahead; In the news;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040914/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040914/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The FTA's impact on generic pharmaceuticals and the PBS: Much ado about nothing?; FTA shakes up copyright law; IP, tax planning, and the Uniform Capital Allowances System; Some sanity returns to IT disputes?; Australian DVD pirate gaoled; APRA's draft Prudential Standard on business continuity management for ADIs and insurers;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200406/29/new_bill_controls_workplace_surveillance.page</guid><title><![CDATA[New Bill controls workplace surveillance]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200406/29/new_bill_controls_workplace_surveillance.page</link><description><![CDATA[The New South Wales Government has released an exposure draft of the Workplace Surveillance Bill 2004 (NSW) for comment. The Bill will have a far-reaching effect on employers.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040610/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040610/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The legality of internet pop-up ads; Harry Potter and the Order of the Federal Court; Draft standard on corporate governance and information and communication technology; How well does our patent regime protect business systems?; Be fair, bugs in software are just defects; Crown ownership of copyright under review; Internet search engines, advertising and trade marks - update; Profile: Paul Armarego;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/FTAReport_2.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[Free Trade Agreement Report]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/FTAReport_2.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Australia and the United States of America completed negotiations to enter into their Free Trade Agreement on 8 February 2004 and signed it on 18 May. This is our initial analytical overview.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040312/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040312/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: New dawn for Australia&#8482;s registered designs laws; Fixing the copyright/design overlap?; &#339;Shiver Me Timbers! still infringes; Internet search engines, advertising and trade marks; Unique aspects of IT PPP projects; Quick bytes; Foreign language marks and deceptive similarity;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>