<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>  <title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz | Product Liability - Publications]]></title>  <link>http://www.claytonutz.com/area_of_law/product_liability/publications.page</link>  <description/>  <copyright><![CDATA[(c) Clayton Utz 2009]]></copyright>    <language>en-au</language> <item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201006/29/major_consumer_law_changes_bring_new_reporting_requirement_for_product_safety_incidents.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Major consumer law changes bring new reporting requirement for product safety incidents]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201006/29/major_consumer_law_changes_bring_new_reporting_requirement_for_product_safety_incidents.page</link><description><![CDATA[A new notification requirement for suppliers where consumer goods have caused (or may have caused) death or serious injury/illness has been introduced by the new Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Bill (No. 2) 2010.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/ProductRiskReview2009.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[Product Risk Year in Review 2009]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/ProductRiskReview2009.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[In our fourth annual review of product risk developments, we round up the decisions of 2009 by Australian courts that may be relevant to manufacturers, suppliers and insurers who do business in Australia.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20100323/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20100323/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Statutory demands for creditors;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20091218/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20091218/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Social networking, social death? Managing your business' and staff's reputation online;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20091201/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20091201/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: What do in-house counsel really need to know about exclusion clauses?;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200911/19/second_set_of_australian_consumer_law_reforms-product_safety_obligations_and_trading_requirements.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Second set of Australian Consumer Law reforms - product safety obligations and trading requirements]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200911/19/second_set_of_australian_consumer_law_reforms-product_safety_obligations_and_trading_requirements.page</link><description><![CDATA[In preparation for the second tranche of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) reforms (to be introduced into Parliament next year) the Treasury has released a consultation paper with draft Regulation Impact Statements (RIS) for public comment by Friday 27 November.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20091103/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20091103/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Prudential regulation catches up with litigation funding; Plaintiffs queuing up to play the blame game post-GFC; Australia to join Hague Service Convention; Recovering damages for diversion of employees - Australia takes note of English decisions;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/food_insights/20090908/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Food Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/food_insights/20090908/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Food for thought: recent changes to Victorian food regulation are good news for business;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20090709/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20090709/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Class actions in Australia: Back to basics; Is evidence served in earlier proceedings covered by litigation privilege?; It's over! When (and how) can you terminate a contract?; Entire agreement clauses - what do they seek to do? Do they work?; High Court clarifies correct test for defamation in business reputation cases; Meet our clients;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/the-international-comparative-legal-guide-to-product-liability-2009.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[International Comparative Legal Guide to Product Liability 2009: Australia]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/the-international-comparative-legal-guide-to-product-liability-2009.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Colin Loveday and Stuart Clark explain the basics of Australian product liability law in this chapter excerpted from Global Legal Group's International Comparative Legal Guide to Product Liability 2009.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20090424/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Product Risk Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20090424/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Health claims and food products: A new chapter in the P293 saga; False nappy biodegradability claims: company director liable; Myth busting: Things go better with Coke; The Productivity Commission to inquire into the Australian anti-dumping and countervailing system; Opposing the proposed changes to the Australian Consumer Law; Power and the passion: Garrett releases National Waste Policy Paper; Selling online games without classification: Will enforcement agencies continue to turn a blind eye?;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/ProductRiskReview_2008.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[Product Risk Year in Review 2008]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/ProductRiskReview_2008.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[In our third annual review of product risk developments, we round up the decisions of 2008 by Australian courts that may be relevant to manufacturers, suppliers and insurers who do business in Australia.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20090219/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Product Risk Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20090219/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The times, they are a changin': Australia's new harmonised consumer laws revealed;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20081219/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20081219/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Sex, lies and videotape: breach of confidence claims and awards of damages; Waiver of privilege - more than a state of mind?; Risky business: Directors' and officers' liability and insurance - are you covered?; Regulator's sources protected from disclosure; Top 10 developments in commercial litigation in 2008;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20081023/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Product Risk Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20081023/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The draft Organic Standard - A step forward or more of the same?; Product disparagement: protecting your product's reputation; Ensuring product safety: Tricks and traps in AS3806 Compliance; Product liability and class actions: The litigation leagues table; National consumer protection laws one step closer; Never mind the Bullocks, here's the Sandersons: Costs orders in a product liability context;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20080904/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20080904/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Conceal or reveal? Reporting white-collar crime; Australia's largest shareholder class action payout - Aristocrat shareholder class action settles; Criminalising cartels - confusion or clarity?; ALRC report on client legal privilege in federal investigations; Loose lips sink ships - but when will they waive privilege in legal advice?; ALRC recommends statutory cause of action for invasion of privacy; Directors' personal liability for misleading and deceptive conduct in relation to shares;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/TheInternationalComparativeLegalGuideto_ProductLiability2008.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[International Comparative Legal Guide to Product Liability 2008: Australia]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/TheInternationalComparativeLegalGuideto_ProductLiability2008.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Colin Loveday and Stuart Clark explain the basics of Australian product liability law in this chapter excerpted from Global Legal Group's International Comparative Legal Guide to Product Liability 2008.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20080722/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Product Risk Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20080722/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Warning: may cause reform! Federalising Australia's product safety system; Be alarmed be very alarmed: class action reforms mooted; On your marks, get set, advertise! The Olympics and ambush marketing; ACCC comes down hard on "greenwashers"; Compliance and product standards; Who's afraid of the plaque? Did "fear for the future" claims in Australia just get harder?;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/TheInternationalComparativeLegalGuideto_PharmaceuticalAdvertising2008.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[International Comparative Legal Guide to Pharmaceutical Advertising 2008: Australia]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/TheInternationalComparativeLegalGuideto_PharmaceuticalAdvertising2008.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Colin Loveday and Greg Williams explain the basics of Australian pharmaceutical advertising law in this chapter excerpted from Global Legal Group's International Comparative Legal Guide to Pharmaceutical Advertising 2008.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20080613/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20080613/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Lady Luck shines light on proportionate liability; Liquidators and funded litigation - is court approval necessary?; Lowering the threshold for the granting of summary judgment; Profile - Tobin Meagher; Sub-prime crisis related litigation in Australia;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20080317/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Product Risk Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20080317/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: It's not easy being green: ACCC cracks down on environmental claims; A nuisance or a nonsense? Liability for products with greenhouse emissions; Grin and bear it: Product regulations, international treaties and trade agreements; A sense of deja vu: Proposed reforms to Australia's consumer policy framework; From baby bath aids to Bindeez: A roundup of recent product safety developments;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/ProductRiskReview2007.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[Product Risk Year in Review 2007]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/ProductRiskReview2007.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[In our second annual review of product risk developments, we round up the decisions of 2007 by Australian courts that may be relevant to manufacturers, suppliers and insurers who do business in Australia.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20071212/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20071212/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Some answers expected soon on continuous disclosure and shareholder class actions; Keeping it to yourself: Australian Law Reform Commission review of Australian privacy laws; Is that information confidential?; Satisfying your e-discovery obligations: how and when to do enough - but not too much!; Meet our clients;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20071210/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Product Risk Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20071210/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Made in China: Caveat venditor; Defective products or defective powers?; Who loves ya baby? Misleading, deceptive and unconscionable conduct; "The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated": Exemplary damages in Australia; Is your finger on the trigger? Asbestos and insurance; "In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane"[1]: Mere opinion or expert evidence?;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/ProductSafetyandLiability.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[Product Liability Risks in the Asia-Pacific: Clayton Utz Asia-Pacific Survey]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/ProductSafetyandLiability.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Jocelyn Kellam discusses the results of our survey of product liability risks in the Asia-Pacific, first published in Product Safety and Liability Vol. 35, No. 35 and reproduced by kind permission.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20070920/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Product Risk Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/product_risk_insights/20070920/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Product liability: A crazy quilt?; Is that your final decision?; The shape of things to come: Product design protection and the need for artistic inspiration; Defective design - How far does your product liability cover go?; Market research reports and marketing experts;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/happy_15th_birthday_part_va_tpa.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[Happy 15th birthday, Part VA TPA! Australia's product liability morass]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/happy_15th_birthday_part_va_tpa.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Jocelyn Kellam and Luke Nottage argue that product liability of manufacturers has become a legal morass.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20070914/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20070914/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Vodcast: Simple tips for surviving litigation; Fiduciary relationships, managing conflicts and Chinese walls; Defective design - How far does your product liability cover go?; Understanding the litigation process;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/food_insights/20070903/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Food Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/food_insights/20070903/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Throwing the baby formula out with the bathwater?;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200708/31/if_you_deal_with_the_government_does_the_tpa_apply_to_you.page</guid><title><![CDATA[If you deal with the Government, does the TPA apply to you?]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200708/31/if_you_deal_with_the_government_does_the_tpa_apply_to_you.page</link><description><![CDATA[If Government is not "carrying on a business", it's not bound by the Trade Practices Act. Does that immunity generally extend to anyone negotiating or contracting with it? The High Court has said "no" in its decision in ACCC v Baxter [2007] HCA 38 (29 August 2007) reversing the effect of the decisions of the Federal Court and of the Full Court of the Federal Court on appeal.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200708/13/patenting_enantiomers-court_decides_there_is_nothing_sinister.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Patenting enantiomers &#8220; court decides there is nothing sinister]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200708/13/patenting_enantiomers-court_decides_there_is_nothing_sinister.page</link><description><![CDATA[As enantiomeric compounds have become increasingly important to the pharmaceutical industry has increased, so has patent protection for them. Nicholas Tyacke and Simone Chernishev look at the first decision in Australia on the infringement and validity of an enantiomer patent.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200708/13/australias_high_court_grapples_with_the_issue_of_obviousness_again.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Australia's High Court grapples with the issue of obviousness again]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200708/13/australias_high_court_grapples_with_the_issue_of_obviousness_again.page</link><description><![CDATA[Wayne Condon explains how the High Court has stepped away from the UK view of "inventive step" - and what that means for patents.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/TheInternationalComparativeLegalGuideto_ProductLiability2007.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[International Comparative Legal Guide to: Product Liability 2007: Australia]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/TheInternationalComparativeLegalGuideto_ProductLiability2007.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Colin Loveday and Stuart Clark explain the basics of Australian product liability law in this chapter excerpted from Global Legal Group's International Comparative Legal Guide to Product Liability 2007.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/TheInternationalComparativeLegalGuideto_PharmaceuticalAdvertising2007-4thEdition.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[International Comparative Legal Guide to Pharmaceutical Advertising 2007: Australia]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/TheInternationalComparativeLegalGuideto_PharmaceuticalAdvertising2007-4thEdition.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Colin Loveday and Greg Williams explain the basics of Australian pharmaceutical advertising law in this chapter excerpted from Global Legal Group's International Comparative Legal Guide to Pharmaceutical Advertising 2007.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/ProductRiskReview2006.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[Product Risk Year in Review 2006]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/ProductRiskReview2006.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Our review gives a snapshot of the major legislative developments and important decisions in 2006 affecting manufacturers, suppliers and insurers who do business in Australia.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200705/30/whats_in_a_name_everything_if_its_a_food_label.page</guid><title><![CDATA[What's in a name? Everything, if it's a food label]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200705/30/whats_in_a_name_everything_if_its_a_food_label.page</link><description><![CDATA[The NSW Food Authority has signalled it means business with a recent prosecution of two breaches of the NSW Food Act which led to a total fine of $30,000 plus $80,000 in costs, in a timely reminder for manufacturers of foods and beverages.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20070511/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20070511/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: From text to context in interpreting contracts - what does it mean for your contracts?; We're all model litigants, says NSW court; When can company officers rely on information provided by others?; RIP non-life reinsurance arbitration in NSW?; Making summary judgment more summary in the Federal Court; Meet our clients;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200705/04/finger_lickin_litigation-latest_us_fast_food_case_thrown_out.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Finger lickin' litigation - latest US fast food case thrown out]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200705/04/finger_lickin_litigation-latest_us_fast_food_case_thrown_out.page</link><description><![CDATA[In yet another defeat for fast food claims, a claim against KFC has been dismissed in the United States. Although the court dismissed the action not on the merits but because the plaintiff did not argue he had been injured by the food, and it could theoretically be brought again, it's another illustration of how difficult it will be to litigate in this area.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200702/27/landmark_survey_reveals_asia_pacific_product_liability_hotspots.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Landmark survey reveals Asia Pacific product liability hotspots]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200702/27/landmark_survey_reveals_asia_pacific_product_liability_hotspots.page</link><description><![CDATA[Don't ignore product liability risks in Asia, but don't be unduly alarmed about becoming embroiled in litigation.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/Product Liability Asia-Pacific Survey_Summary.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz Product Liability Asia-Pacific Survey - summary report]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/Product Liability Asia-Pacific Survey_Summary.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Over the past three years, Clayton Utz has undertaken a survey of product liability risks in the Asia-Pacific region, assessing the impact of legislative reforms since 1992.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20061204/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20061204/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Litigation funding in the High Court; Litigation funding in the High Court; "Giving up the gist" - The dangers of imputed waiver of legal professional privilege; "Giving up the gist" - The dangers of imputed waiver of legal professional privilege; Limitation of liability and indemnity clauses: the knock-out punch of proportionate liability; Limitation of liability and indemnity clauses: the knock-out punch of proportionate liability; Meet our clients; Meet our clients; Profile: Ian Bloemendal; Profile: Ian Bloemendal;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200611/27/clayton_utz_100_pure_fresh_natural_alert_on_food_labelling.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz' 100% pure, fresh, natural alert on food labelling]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200611/27/clayton_utz_100_pure_fresh_natural_alert_on_food_labelling.page</link><description><![CDATA[Do your food products claim to be "fresh", "pure", or natural? These sorts of descriptions are frequently used but if you use them carelessly, you might fall foul of the Trade Practices Act and face enforcement action from the ACCC, which has signalled it will be taking particular interest in food descriptions.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/ProductLiability_FoodLawPaper.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[Product Liability Food Law Paper]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/ProductLiability_FoodLawPaper.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[We represent some of Australia's largest food manufacturers and retailers on all aspects of food law - whether it be product liability, hygiene and safety issues, compliance, food recall, advertising or composition issues.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200608/30/litigation_funding_allowed_by_high_court_funder_loses_battle_but_wins_war.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation funding allowed by High Court: funder loses battle but wins war]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200608/30/litigation_funding_allowed_by_high_court_funder_loses_battle_but_wins_war.page</link><description><![CDATA[In Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Limited v Fostif Pty Ltd, the first decision by Australia's highest court on litigation funding, the Court held 5:2 that litigation funding was not an abuse of process or contrary to public policy. The majority was composed of Justices Gummow, Hayne and Crennan (in a joint judgment), Chief Justice Gleeson and Justice Kirby.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200608/29/international_comparative_legal_guide_to_pharmaceutical_advertising_2006.page</guid><title><![CDATA[International Comparative Legal Guide to: Pharmaceutical Advertising 2006]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200608/29/international_comparative_legal_guide_to_pharmaceutical_advertising_2006.page</link><description><![CDATA[Product liability law experts, Clayton Utz partner Colin Loveday and senior associate Greg Williams, have contributed the Australian chapter to the "International Comparative Legal Guide to: Pharmaceutical Advertising 2006". Contributions are by invitation only, and Colin and Greg are the only Australian lawyers featured.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200608/18/clayton_utz_lawyers_help_overseas_lawyers_navigate_australias_product_laws.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz lawyers help overseas lawyers navigate Australia's product laws]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200608/18/clayton_utz_lawyers_help_overseas_lawyers_navigate_australias_product_laws.page</link><description><![CDATA[Lawyers around the world can learn about Australia's product liability laws - with the help of two Clayton Utz lawyers. "The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Product Liability 2006: A practical insight to cross-border Product Liability work", published by Global Legal Group Ltd, London, is an important global guide to product liability law for general counsel, government agencies, and private practice lawyers across the globe.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20060802/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20060802/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: "Without prejudice" privilege: traps for young (and old) players; Privilege limited in commission of inquiry; When can your defence amount to a waiver of legal professional privilege?; Preparing for the punch of proportionate liability; Enforcement of cartel conduct - a new era of private enforcement?; Meet our clients; Profile: Doug Bishop;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/TheInternationalComparativeLegalGuideto_ProductLiability2006.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[International Comparative Legal Guide to: Product Liability 2006: Australia]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/TheInternationalComparativeLegalGuideto_ProductLiability2006.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Colin Loveday and Stuart Clark explain the basics of Australian product liability law in this chapter excerpted from Global Legal Group's International Comparative Legal Guide to Product Liability 2006.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/30/a_strong_dose_of_regulation_for_pharmaceuticals_sector.page</guid><title><![CDATA[A strong dose of regulation for pharmaceuticals sector]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/30/a_strong_dose_of_regulation_for_pharmaceuticals_sector.page</link><description><![CDATA[Companies operating in the pharmaceuticals and medical devices sectors will need to be extra vigilant in maintaining good business and risk management practices following changes to the regulatory regime under which they operate, according to a leading corporate lawyer.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/22/be_prepared_new_tga_enforcement_powers_start_soon.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Be prepared! New TGA enforcement powers start soon]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/22/be_prepared_new_tga_enforcement_powers_start_soon.page</link><description><![CDATA[Australia now has a strengthened regime within the Australian therapeutic goods market including a tiered regime of criminal offences and civil penalties, higher penalties, and liability for "executive officers", following the passage of the Therapeutic Goods Amendment Act 2006. Most of the changes will come into effect on 31 May 2006, breathing new life into the powers of the Therapeutic Goods Authority ("TGA") to enforce the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989 (Cth).]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>