<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>  <title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz | Commercial Litigation - Publications]]></title>  <link>http://www.claytonutz.com/area_of_law/litigation_and_dispute_resolution/commercial_litigation/publications.page</link>  <description/>  <copyright><![CDATA[(c) Clayton Utz 2009]]></copyright>    <language>en-au</language> <item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/22_december_2011/20111222/privilege_and_in-house_counsel_tips_to_avoid_waiver_of_privilege_part_2.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Privilege and in-house counsel: Tips to avoid waiver of privilege part 2]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/22_december_2011/20111222/privilege_and_in-house_counsel_tips_to_avoid_waiver_of_privilege_part_2.page</link><description><![CDATA[There are some simple steps in-house counsel can take to ensure privilege isn't waived, say Karen Ingram and Danielle Briers.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/08_december_2011/20111208/arbitration_and_abuse_of_process_high_court_clarifies_their_interaction.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Arbitration and abuse of process: High Court clarifies their interaction]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/08_december_2011/20111208/arbitration_and_abuse_of_process_high_court_clarifies_their_interaction.page</link><description><![CDATA[The High Court has brought some much-needed clarity to general principles of international arbitration law, abuse of process and inconsistent determinations, say Sid Wang and James Robinson.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/08_december_2011/20111208/privilege_and_in-house_counsel-tips_to_ensure_privilege_applies.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Privilege and in-house counsel - Tips to ensure privilege applies]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/08_december_2011/20111208/privilege_and_in-house_counsel-tips_to_ensure_privilege_applies.page</link><description><![CDATA[Karen Ingram and Danielle Briers set out the practical steps you can take to ensure privilege attaches &#8220; and stays attached.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/08_december_2011/20111208/when_can_a_party_restrict_the_use_of_an_unconditional_performance_guarantee.page</guid><title><![CDATA[When can a party restrict the use of an unconditional performance guarantee?]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/08_december_2011/20111208/when_can_a_party_restrict_the_use_of_an_unconditional_performance_guarantee.page</link><description><![CDATA[When a party to a contract can restrict another party from calling upon the benefit of a performance guarantee has again been before the courts, as Michelle Larin reports.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/24_november_2011/20111124/who_cares_what_you_think_contracts_and_the_parties_subjective_intentions.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Who cares what you think? Contracts and the parties' subjective intentions]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/24_november_2011/20111124/who_cares_what_you_think_contracts_and_the_parties_subjective_intentions.page</link><description><![CDATA[Business - and some lawyers! - often think that their subjective intent trumps the words of their contracts. As Julie Granger explains, this isn't right, as confirmed by a recent High Court decision that has tried to clear up the confusion.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/24_november_2011/20111124/foreign_anti-bribery_laws-will_government_abandon_a_critical_protection.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Foreign anti-bribery laws - will Government abandon a critical protection?]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/24_november_2011/20111124/foreign_anti-bribery_laws-will_government_abandon_a_critical_protection.page</link><description><![CDATA[The possible removal of the facilitation payments defence to foreign bribery is a potentially critical development for companies doing business in international jurisdictions that pose challenging corruption issues, as Gary Berson and Michael Maxwell explain.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/24_november_2011/20111124/regulation_of_litigation_funding-a_death_knell_for_funders_or_a_bump_in_the_road.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Regulation of litigation funding - a death knell for funders or a bump in the road?]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/24_november_2011/20111124/regulation_of_litigation_funding-a_death_knell_for_funders_or_a_bump_in_the_road.page</link><description><![CDATA[While there's renewed attention on the need to regulate litigation funding, Ross McInnes and Alexandra Kennedy-Breit say it's unlikely to dampen the class action or booming litigation funding industries.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201111/15/avoiding_one_size_fits_all.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Avoiding one size fits all]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201111/15/avoiding_one_size_fits_all.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Federal Attorney-General has announced that the Government will introduce the Civil Dispute Resolution Bill to implement recommendations made by the National Alternative Dispute Resolution Advisory Council (NADRAC) by requiring prospective litigants to take genuine steps to attempt to resolve their disputes before commencing proceedings in federal courts.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201111/14/pro_bono_deserves_more_than_lip_service.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Pro bono deserves more than lip service]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201111/14/pro_bono_deserves_more_than_lip_service.page</link><description><![CDATA[The national survey of pro bono legal work by solicitors released by the National Pro Bono Resource Centre last week contains important messages for management at larger commercial firms about what is required to build a genuine pro bono culture with employed solicitors.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201110/14/litigation_funding_in_policy_vacuum.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation funding in policy vacuum]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201110/14/litigation_funding_in_policy_vacuum.page</link><description><![CDATA[Love 'em or loathe 'em, professional litigation funders are here to stay.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201108/03/genuine_steps_in_the_right_direction_the_civil_dispute_resolution_act_2011.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Genuine steps in the right direction? The Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201108/03/genuine_steps_in_the_right_direction_the_civil_dispute_resolution_act_2011.page</link><description><![CDATA[Under the Civil Dispute Resolution Act 2011, litigants will have to provide a statement of the (genuine) steps taken to resolve the dispute prior to filing proceedings.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/audio/international_bribery_crackdown.page</guid><title><![CDATA[International bribery crackdown]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/audio/international_bribery_crackdown.page</link><description><![CDATA[Andrew Morrison from our Litigation team talks to BRR Media about the increased regulator activity in combating bribery and corruption in international business dealings]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20110408/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20110408/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Privilege and in-house lawyers: 10 tips for successful privilege claims; High Court to consider international arbitration and bias issues; What are you excluding in your contract's exclusion clause?; Misled during mediation? Will "without prejudice" privilege protect those misrepresentations?; Meet Karen Ingram; Meet our clients;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201104/04/uk_bribery_act_starts_on_1_july_2011-are_you_ready.page</guid><title><![CDATA[UK Bribery Act starts on 1 July 2011 - are you ready?]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201104/04/uk_bribery_act_starts_on_1_july_2011-are_you_ready.page</link><description><![CDATA[The UK Bribery Act will commence on 1 July 2011, so if your company is carrying on business in the UK, and the UK Ministry of Justice has released guidance on the new laws.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201103/25/traps_in_professional_privilege.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Traps in professional privilege]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201103/25/traps_in_professional_privilege.page</link><description><![CDATA[The litigation environment for Australian businesses has never been more fraught. Media reports appear almost daily of "potential" class actions - like those recently commenced against Nufarm and ABC Learningfor allegedly breaching their continuous disclosure obligations or making misleading or deceptive statements.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201103/10/low-ball_offer_caught_out_by_inquiring_responsible_entity.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Low-ball offer caught out by inquiring responsible entity]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201103/10/low-ball_offer_caught_out_by_inquiring_responsible_entity.page</link><description><![CDATA[Funds managers whose unitholders are targeted by low-ball offers can take some heart from Perpetual Investment Management's success in the NSW Supreme Court]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20101215/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20101215/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: New risks for directors under the Australian Consumer Law; Express and extended warranties, and the new Australian Consumer Law; Product safety and notification under the Australian Consumer Law; The Australian Consumer Law: What's a defective good and what do you have to do about it?;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201012/09/new_south_wales_introduces_pre-litigation_procedures_but_what_will_they_change.page</guid><title><![CDATA[New South Wales introduces pre-litigation procedures - but what will they change?]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201012/09/new_south_wales_introduces_pre-litigation_procedures_but_what_will_they_change.page</link><description><![CDATA[New South Wales has introduced new pre-litigation requirements, but whether they go substantially beyond litigation best practice, or how they will operate, is still unclear.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Dec 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20101018/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20101018/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Waiver refresher: Be alert to the possibility of waiving legal professional privilege; Express clauses for terminating a contract: when can you exercise your rights?;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201009/17/european_court_holds_no_legal_privilege_for_in-house_lawyers.page</guid><title><![CDATA[European Court holds no legal privilege for in-house lawyers]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201009/17/european_court_holds_no_legal_privilege_for_in-house_lawyers.page</link><description><![CDATA[The decision by the European Court of Justice in Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd v Commission of the European Communities held that internal communications by company employees with in-house counsel do not satisfy the lawyer/client test.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20100823/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20100823/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Civil Dispute Resolution Bill - a genuine step towards more ADR?; Global reach of US securities class actions curbed; NSW announces reforms to its class action laws; What you really need to know about alternative dispute resolution clauses; Speak now, or forever hold your peace; Insolvency on a global scale; Meet our clients;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20100323/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20100323/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Statutory demands for creditors;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20091218/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20091218/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Social networking, social death? Managing your business' and staff's reputation online;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20091201/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20091201/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: What do in-house counsel really need to know about exclusion clauses?;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20091103/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20091103/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Prudential regulation catches up with litigation funding; Plaintiffs queuing up to play the blame game post-GFC; Australia to join Hague Service Convention; Recovering damages for diversion of employees - Australia takes note of English decisions;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20090709/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20090709/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Class actions in Australia: Back to basics; Is evidence served in earlier proceedings covered by litigation privilege?; It's over! When (and how) can you terminate a contract?; Entire agreement clauses - what do they seek to do? Do they work?; High Court clarifies correct test for defamation in business reputation cases; Meet our clients;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200905/12/revolution_in_contract_law_covers_business_contracts_as_well_as_consumer_contracts.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Revolution in contract law covers business contracts as well as consumer contracts]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200905/12/revolution_in_contract_law_covers_business_contracts_as_well_as_consumer_contracts.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Federal Government's draft unfair contract terms law released yesterday for public comment will affect not only contracts entered into with consumers, but contracts between businesses, so many businesses across Australia will need to review all their standard-form contracts soon.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20081219/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20081219/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Sex, lies and videotape: breach of confidence claims and awards of damages; Waiver of privilege - more than a state of mind?; Risky business: Directors' and officers' liability and insurance - are you covered?; Regulator's sources protected from disclosure; Top 10 developments in commercial litigation in 2008;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20080904/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20080904/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Conceal or reveal? Reporting white-collar crime; Australia's largest shareholder class action payout - Aristocrat shareholder class action settles; Criminalising cartels - confusion or clarity?; ALRC report on client legal privilege in federal investigations; Loose lips sink ships - but when will they waive privilege in legal advice?; ALRC recommends statutory cause of action for invasion of privacy; Directors' personal liability for misleading and deceptive conduct in relation to shares;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20080613/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20080613/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Lady Luck shines light on proportionate liability; Liquidators and funded litigation - is court approval necessary?; Lowering the threshold for the granting of summary judgment; Profile - Tobin Meagher; Sub-prime crisis related litigation in Australia;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20071212/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20071212/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Some answers expected soon on continuous disclosure and shareholder class actions; Keeping it to yourself: Australian Law Reform Commission review of Australian privacy laws; Is that information confidential?; Satisfying your e-discovery obligations: how and when to do enough - but not too much!; Meet our clients;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/videos/simple_tips_for_surviving_litigation.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Simple tips for surviving litigation]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/videos/simple_tips_for_surviving_litigation.page</link><description><![CDATA[There are some simple things you can do to avoid litigation, or at least get out of it alive, say Peter Keel and Norm Lucas.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20070914/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20070914/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Vodcast: Simple tips for surviving litigation; Fiduciary relationships, managing conflicts and Chinese walls; Defective design - How far does your product liability cover go?; Understanding the litigation process;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20070511/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20070511/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: From text to context in interpreting contracts - what does it mean for your contracts?; We're all model litigants, says NSW court; When can company officers rely on information provided by others?; RIP non-life reinsurance arbitration in NSW?; Making summary judgment more summary in the Federal Court; Meet our clients;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20061204/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20061204/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Litigation funding in the High Court; " Giving up the gist" - The dangers of imputed waiver of legal professional privilege; Limitation of liability and in]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20060802/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20060802/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: "Without prejudice" privilege: traps for young (and old) players; Privilege limited in commission of inquiry; When can your defence amount to a waiver of legal professional privilege?; Preparing for the punch of proportionate liability; Enforcement of cartel conduct - a new era of private enforcement?; Meet our clients; Profile: Doug Bishop;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20060427/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20060427/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Is there safety in numbers?; Responding to a regulator's request for documents; Is your D&O coverage up to scratch?; Success for Clayton Utz' Recovery & Insolvency team; Meet our clients; Profile: Doug Galbraith;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20051209/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20051209/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Litigation funding agreements - the future's in the balance; Expert forensic accounting evidence: when is it admissible?; Dominant purpose, third parties, and legal professional privilege; Fixating upon the fixing of remuneration: the Stockford decision; Boardroom dynamics; New partners for Litigation;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20050531/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20050531/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: "Pure" economic loss: is the law any clearer yet?; Defamation and the Internet - Avoiding liability for publication; Invisible service; Backup tapes: friend or foe?; Fishy questions for the Federal Court;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20050208/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20050208/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The growth of commercial litigation funding; ASIC can continue investigating even though it has commenced proceedings; Shareholders' rights to inspect the company's books; Here's the information for what it's worth: Disclaimers and the TPA; Clayton Utz sponsors INSOL 2005; Profile: Stuart Clark; Profile: Mark van Brakel;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20040826/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20040826/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Legal advice privilege and communications with third parties; Federal Government stitches up defendants' deep pockets in section 52 claims; Sex, drugs and breach of confidence; Mortgagee unable to enforce an unconscionable mortgage;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20040527/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Litigation and Dispute Resolution Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/litigation_and_dispute_resolution_insights/20040527/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Applying "overriding objectives" of UK civil procedural reforms in Australia; Directors' stand alone duty to disclose misconduct; Damages for misleading conduct - The centrality of causation and reliance; Interpreting "loss or damage" under the Trade Practices Act;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
