<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>  <title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz | Trade Marks - Publications]]></title>  <link>http://www.claytonutz.com/area_of_law/intellectual_property/trade_marks/publications.page</link>  <description><![CDATA[Clayton Utz' trade marks team is a one-stop shop for the management and protection of brand portfolios.]]></description>  <copyright><![CDATA[(c) Clayton Utz 2009]]></copyright>    <language>en-au</language> <item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201201/17/no_breach_of_trade_mark_licence_agreement.page</guid><title><![CDATA[No breach of trade mark licence agreement]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201201/17/no_breach_of_trade_mark_licence_agreement.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia has overturned a finding that there had been a breach of a trade mark licence agreement between two formerly associated companies.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201111/29/survey_evidence_in_trade_mark_cases-is_it_any_use.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Survey evidence in trade mark cases - Is it any use?]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201111/29/survey_evidence_in_trade_mark_cases-is_it_any_use.page</link><description><![CDATA[adidas brought an application under section 120 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) seeking a declaration that Pacific Brands had infringed its three-stripe trade mark by supplying certain footwear which also displayed decorative stripes.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/27_october_2011/20111027/same_name_different_companies_piggybacking_off_anothers_reputation_and_trade_marks.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Same name, different companies: piggybacking off another's reputation and trade marks]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/27_october_2011/20111027/same_name_different_companies_piggybacking_off_anothers_reputation_and_trade_marks.page</link><description><![CDATA[How do you protect your trade marks from use by another? Mary Still sets out some basic tips and lessons from a recent case.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/13_october_2011/20111013/google_gets_results_in_ad_words_case.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Google gets results in ad words case]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/13_october_2011/20111013/google_gets_results_in_ad_words_case.page</link><description><![CDATA[Sponsored links are here to stay, but businesses who place advertisements on Google must make sure they do not imply that their business has an association or affiliation which does not exist, say Richard Hoad and Melanie Keith.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/13_october_2011/20111013/good_news_for_trade_mark_owners_strict_-au_domain_name_rules_remain_largely_unchanged.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Good news for trade mark owners: strict ".au" domain name rules remain largely unchanged]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/edition/13_october_2011/20111013/good_news_for_trade_mark_owners_strict_-au_domain_name_rules_remain_largely_unchanged.page</link><description><![CDATA[Australian brand owners can still rely upon some strong protections for their online brand, as Deborah Polites and James Neil explain.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201106/23/yeswe-cann-icann_opens_the_domain_name_floodgates.page</guid><title><![CDATA[yeswe.cann - ICANN opens the domain name floodgates]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201106/23/yeswe-cann-icann_opens_the_domain_name_floodgates.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), the entity responsible for the management of top-level domains, has approved a groundbreaking plan to dramatically increase the number of domain name suffixes that are available.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201106/21/colour_trade_marks.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Colour trade marks]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201106/21/colour_trade_marks.page</link><description><![CDATA[Ordinary experience, history and literature all tell us that colours operate as powerful stimulants of memory, identification and loyalty.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201105/23/who_owns_this_ip_independent_contractors_vs_employees_in_ip_ownership_disputes.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Who owns this IP? Independent contractors vs employees in IP ownership disputes]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201105/23/who_owns_this_ip_independent_contractors_vs_employees_in_ip_ownership_disputes.page</link><description><![CDATA[Generally in the workplace context, any intellectual property (IP) created by an employee in the course of their employment is, in the normal course, owned by the employer.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201105/16/removal_of_a_trade_mark_for_non-use_and_the_courts_discretion.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Removal of a trade mark for non-use and the court's discretion]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201105/16/removal_of_a_trade_mark_for_non-use_and_the_courts_discretion.page</link><description><![CDATA[Austin Nichols, the owner of WILD TURKEY for bourbon and other alcoholic drinks, unsuccessfully sought removal of Lodestar's WILD GEESE registration for beverages in classes 32 & 33. Austin appealed from the Registrar of Trade Marks to the Federal Court of Australia, which considered three issues (Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt [2011] FCA 39).]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201103/11/persian_fetta_sounds_exotic_but_that_doesnt_make_it_a_trade_mark.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Persian Fetta: Sounds exotic, but that doesn't make it a trade mark]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201103/11/persian_fetta_sounds_exotic_but_that_doesnt_make_it_a_trade_mark.page</link><description><![CDATA[Choosing brands and trade marks has always been an important selection, and the decision in Yarra Valley Dairy Pty Ltd v Lemnos Foods Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 1367 highlights the importance for Australian businesses in choosing differentiating and distinctive trade marks that are able to distinguish their goods and services from their competitors.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201102/08/federal_governments_2011_legislative_plans_for_intellectual_property.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Federal Government's 2011 legislative plans for intellectual property]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201102/08/federal_governments_2011_legislative_plans_for_intellectual_property.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Prime Minister has released the list of legislation proposed for introduction in the Autumn sittings of Federal Parliament, starting Tuesday 8 February.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201012/23/the_importance_of_being_specific_ip_ownership_in_employee_contracts.page</guid><title><![CDATA[The importance of being specific: IP ownership in employee contracts]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201012/23/the_importance_of_being_specific_ip_ownership_in_employee_contracts.page</link><description><![CDATA[In general, an employer is taken to own any intellectual property (IP) that is created by an employee in the course of their employment. The recent case of Courier Pete Pty Ltd v Metroll Queensland Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 735 highlights the importance of ensuring that this is clearly stated in the employee's contract.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201012/06/new_anti-counterfeiting_trade_agreement_finalised-now_to_see_if_australia_ratifies_it.page</guid><title><![CDATA[New Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement finalised - now to see if Australia ratifies it]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201012/06/new_anti-counterfeiting_trade_agreement_finalised-now_to_see_if_australia_ratifies_it.page</link><description><![CDATA[The text of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, a new international intellectual property agreement on enforcement obligations aimed at countering copyright and trade mark piracy, has been settled.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201011/22/making_your_trap_count_in_passing_off_claims.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Making your trap count in passing off claims]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201011/22/making_your_trap_count_in_passing_off_claims.page</link><description><![CDATA[It is commonplace in litigation involving claims of misleading or deceptive conduct or passing off to rely on evidence obtained by way of "trap" orders or dealings. The recent decision in Nick Scali Limited v Super A-Mart Pty Limited [2010] FCA 1130 highlights that the weight given to such evidence could be diminished where the applicant fails to give timely notice of the trap dealing to the respondent.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201008/27/is_your_trade_mark_distinctive_or_just_descriptive.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Is your trade mark distinctive or just descriptive?]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201008/27/is_your_trade_mark_distinctive_or_just_descriptive.page</link><description><![CDATA[Mary Still and Brett Doyle look at the problems of using a common term for your trade mark.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201007/09/makers_of_counterfeit_ugg_boots_imprisoned_for_contempt_of_court.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Makers of counterfeit Ugg Boots imprisoned for contempt of court]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201007/09/makers_of_counterfeit_ugg_boots_imprisoned_for_contempt_of_court.page</link><description><![CDATA[Imprisonment in IP cases is unusual, but as Mary Still and Korina Hui explain, it is available when the infringer flouts court orders.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201006/25/whiskas_purple_colour_mark_gets_up_in_federal_court.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Whiskas purple colour mark gets up in Federal Court]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201006/25/whiskas_purple_colour_mark_gets_up_in_federal_court.page</link><description><![CDATA[A successful application for a colour mark should give brand owners some encouragement to explore registering their own colour marks, say Mary Still and Brett Doyle.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201005/03/seizing_counterfeit_goods_under_the_trade_marks_act-a_warning_to_pirates_everywhere.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Seizing counterfeit goods under the Trade Marks Act - a warning to pirates everywhere]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201005/03/seizing_counterfeit_goods_under_the_trade_marks_act-a_warning_to_pirates_everywhere.page</link><description><![CDATA[The Trade Marks Act gives trade mark owners a powerful tool for seizing counterfeits, say Mary Still and Lauren Kapp, as a recent case shows.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201004/29/european_google_adwords_case-a_win_both_for_trade_mark_owners_and_for_google.page</guid><title><![CDATA[European Google AdWords case - a win both for trade mark owners and for Google]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201004/29/european_google_adwords_case-a_win_both_for_trade_mark_owners_and_for_google.page</link><description><![CDATA[The EU's highest court has struck a blow for trade mark owners whose marks are used by competitors in paid advertisements on search engines. Nicholas Tyacke and Kelly Marshall explain.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201004/23/whos_aggrieved_high_court_gives_greater_scope_for_seeking_deregistration_of_a_rivals_trade_mark.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Who's aggrieved? High Court gives greater scope for seeking deregistration of a rival's trade mark]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201004/23/whos_aggrieved_high_court_gives_greater_scope_for_seeking_deregistration_of_a_rivals_trade_mark.page</link><description><![CDATA[The High Court's decision in Health World Ltd v Shin-Sun Australia Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 13 will make it easier to apply to remove a competitor's mark that may have been wrongly made or which wrongly remains on the Trade Marks Register.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201003/29/federal_court_gives_the_kiss-off_to_luscious_lips_trade_mark_owners.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Federal Court gives the kiss-off to Luscious Lips trade mark owners]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201003/29/federal_court_gives_the_kiss-off_to_luscious_lips_trade_mark_owners.page</link><description><![CDATA[Mary Still explains why the Federal Court found use of a trade-marked term by another in the same class was not infringement.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201003/11/registrar_of_trade_marks_turns_up_heat_on_magazines.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Registrar of Trade Marks turns up HEAT on magazines]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201003/11/registrar_of_trade_marks_turns_up_heat_on_magazines.page</link><description><![CDATA[IP Australia has just released the decision of the delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks in relation to the opposition by Giramondo against registration of the trade mark HEAT by Bauer.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201002/05/trade_mark_specialist_joins_clayton_utz.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Trade mark specialist joins Clayton Utz]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201002/05/trade_mark_specialist_joins_clayton_utz.page</link><description><![CDATA[Clayton Utz is pleased to announce the appointment of trade mark specialist Brett Doyle as a Special Counsel in its Intellectual Property group, one of the largest and most experienced in Australia.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200812/04/tm_infringement-government_review_of_penalties_and_additional_damages.page</guid><title><![CDATA[TM infringement - Government Review of Penalties and Additional Damages]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200812/04/tm_infringement-government_review_of_penalties_and_additional_damages.page</link><description><![CDATA[Four and a half years ago, the Advisory Council on Intellectual Property conducted a Review of Trade Mark Enforcement, which suggested that penalties for trade mark infringement should be reviewed.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20080630/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20080630/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Tricks of the trade (and how not to get trapped) - intellectual property and government grants; A new meaning of consequential loss in technology contracts; Controlling copyright created in the workplace; Trade mark infringement - who can provide consent?; Use it or lose it!; Patents and the financial services industry - show me the money!;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/IPLitigationinAustralia_May 08.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Litigation in Australia]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/IPLitigationinAustralia_May 08.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Litigation in Australia.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20061215/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20061215/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: So where the bloody hell are you online?; Bad news for Google News; It's good governance - Don't overstate the commercial significance of your IP; Opposing or revoking a trade mark - important changes; Business method patents - does your invention have a physical effect or consequence?; Infringing a design: it might not be obvious, but it could be fraudulent; Technological protection measures and circumvention devices - will new laws solve the problem?;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200608/07/clayton_utz_lawyers_admired_in_asia.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz lawyers admired in Asia]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200608/07/clayton_utz_lawyers_admired_in_asia.page</link><description><![CDATA[Clayton Utz partners have been recognised as among the most admired in Asia in a guide to the region's leading commercial lawyers. Eight Clayton Utz partners have been named in Asialaw Leading Lawyers 2006, which honours the region's top legal counsel in a broad range of jurisdictions and practice areas.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20060719/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20060719/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Lara Bingle sues men's magazine - protecting personality rights in Australia; It's patently not obvious to an Aussie Rules coach; Domain names and trade marks: Words of caution from the UK High Court; Review of technological protection measures exceptions: is there an easier way?; When is a licence agreement a franchise agreement?; Name the wrong inventors, lose your patent; Shakeup in evidence preparation for patent oppositions; Trade marks and the issue of bad faith in "non-use applications": who bears the burden of proof?; Summary judgment in Australian IP cases;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/23/colour_trade_mark_disputes_may_leave_businesses_in_the_dark.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Colour trade mark disputes may leave businesses in the dark]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/23/colour_trade_mark_disputes_may_leave_businesses_in_the_dark.page</link><description><![CDATA[Businesses that want to secure the exclusive right to use a particular colour in association with their products are likely to face an uphill battle unless they can show that their competitors have deliberately attempted to trade on their reputation by using the same or a similar hue, according to a leading IP lawyer.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/17/protecting_brands_a_matter_of_using_or_losing.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Protecting brands a matter of using or losing]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/17/protecting_brands_a_matter_of_using_or_losing.page</link><description><![CDATA["Use it or lose it" - that's the message a leading IP lawyer has for businesses that believe trade mark registrations alone are enough to protect their valuable brands.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/08/clayton_utz_partner_takes_on_top_ipba_role.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz partner takes on top IPBA role]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/08/clayton_utz_partner_takes_on_top_ipba_role.page</link><description><![CDATA[Clayton Utz partner Jim FitzSimons has officially stepped into his new role of President of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association following the association's 16th annual conference, which Mr FitzSimons describes as having been an outstanding success.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20051214/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20051214/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The Block is no Dream Home - copyright and television program formats; Does your invention "benefit Australian society as a whole" - a new test for patentability; Who owns the IP devised by a company director?; Experimenting at your peril?; A case of software "look and feel"; Crown copyright &#8220; an uncertain future; GITC version 5 - Government ICT contracting in Queensland moves to a new age;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050902/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050902/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: When linking is infringing: the MP3s4FREE case; Was Grokster really a victory for the entertainment industry?; New Act controls workplace surveillance; Is publishing a website "doing business in Australia"?; Court says "cheese" to TV cameras - but are we any the wiser?; Copyright and implied licences - when do they arise?; Do exclusion clauses work?;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050509/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050509/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Big changes to ownership of sound recordings and performers' rights; Can offering products on a foreign website infringe Australian trade marks?; Who wants to be a patentee?; Update on Madrid Protocol; You paid for it - but do you own it, and can you protect your investment?;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200409/29/want_to_bag_the_companys_ip_you_just_may_get_caught_and_taken_to_the_cleaners.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Want to bag the company's IP? You just may get caught and taken to the cleaners]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200409/29/want_to_bag_the_companys_ip_you_just_may_get_caught_and_taken_to_the_cleaners.page</link><description><![CDATA[In endorsing the Deloitte Forensic recent survey that found that intellectual property theft is rampant in Australian companies, leading intellectual property lawyer Wayne Condon has warned both individuals and companies that they are under a misapprehension if they think this is an unstoppable business risk]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040914/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040914/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The FTA's impact on generic pharmaceuticals and the PBS: Much ado about nothing?; FTA shakes up copyright law; IP, tax planning, and the Uniform Capital Allowances System; Some sanity returns to IT disputes?; Australian DVD pirate gaoled; APRA's draft Prudential Standard on business continuity management for ADIs and insurers;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040610/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040610/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The legality of internet pop-up ads; Harry Potter and the Order of the Federal Court; Draft standard on corporate governance and information and communication technology; How well does our patent regime protect business systems?; Be fair, bugs in software are just defects; Crown ownership of copyright under review; Internet search engines, advertising and trade marks - update; Profile: Paul Armarego;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200406/02/clayton_utz_commits_itself_to_the_inter-pacific_bar_association.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz commits itself to the Inter-Pacific Bar Association]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200406/02/clayton_utz_commits_itself_to_the_inter-pacific_bar_association.page</link><description><![CDATA[Australian law firm Clayton Utz has confirmed its commitment to legal practice in the Asia Pacific region with a number of partners accepting positions to serve the Inter-Pacific Bar Association.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040312/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040312/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: New dawn for Australia's registered designs laws; Fixing the copyright/design overlap?; "Shiver Me Timbers!" still infringes; Internet search engines, advertising and trade marks; Unique aspects of IT PPP projects; Quick bytes; Foreign language marks and deceptive similarity;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
