<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"> <channel>  <title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz | Patents - Publications]]></title>  <link>http://www.claytonutz.com/area_of_law/intellectual_property/patents/publications.page</link>  <description/>  <copyright><![CDATA[(c) Clayton Utz 2009]]></copyright>    <language>en-au</language> <item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201005/26/implementing_the_trips_protocol-public_comment_sought.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Implementing the TRIPS Protocol - public comment sought]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201005/26/implementing_the_trips_protocol-public_comment_sought.page</link><description><![CDATA[IPAustralia is seeking comment on the implementation of the TRIPS Protocol, which would make compulsory licences for pharmaceutical products easier to grant.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201003/29/employers_employees_and_intellectual_property_the_saga_of_university_of_western_australia_v_gray.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Employers, employees, and intellectual property: The saga of University of Western Australia v Gray]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201003/29/employers_employees_and_intellectual_property_the_saga_of_university_of_western_australia_v_gray.page</link><description><![CDATA[Mary Still and Lauren Kapp explain the ownership of the inventions of university employees arising from the UWA v Gray case - an important question for universities, and the private sector firms which use those inventions.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201002/26/enforcing_patents_likely_to_get_easier_in_australia.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Enforcing patents likely to get easier in Australia]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/201002/26/enforcing_patents_likely_to_get_easier_in_australia.page</link><description><![CDATA[Nicholas Tyacke and Lauren Kapp look at the key recommendations in the Advisory Council on Intellectual Property's final report, "Post Grant Patent Enforcement Strategies.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200904/22/patents_worth_the_trouble_when_entrepreneurship_at_stake.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Patents worth the trouble when entrepreneurship at stake]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200904/22/patents_worth_the_trouble_when_entrepreneurship_at_stake.page</link><description><![CDATA[Sydney, 22 April 2009: Software company Uniloc's US$388 million victory in its long-running patent infringement dispute with Microsoft is a win for the patent system and should encourage patent holders who are prepared to go all the way to protect their rights, according to Clayton Utz intellectual property partner Jim FitzSimons.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20080630/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20080630/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Tricks of the trade (and how not to get trapped) - intellectual property and government grants; A new meaning of consequential loss in technology contracts; Controlling copyright created in the workplace; Trade mark infringement - who can provide consent?; Use it or lose it!; Patents and the financial services industry - show me the money!;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/IPLitigationinAustralia_May 08.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Litigation in Australia]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/IPLitigationinAustralia_May 08.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[Intellectual Property Litigation in Australia.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200709/04/can_you_patent_a_building_you_can_bet_your_house_on_it.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Can you patent a building? You can bet your house on it!]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200709/04/can_you_patent_a_building_you_can_bet_your_house_on_it.page</link><description><![CDATA[The architectural, building and construction industries generate a tremendous amount of intellectual property, much of which is protected by copyright. Should you be looking to patent law too? In the right circumstances, say Nicholas Tyacke and Anurag Verma, a patent could be the solution.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200708/13/patenting_enantiomers-court_decides_there_is_nothing_sinister.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Patenting enantiomers &#8220; court decides there is nothing sinister]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200708/13/patenting_enantiomers-court_decides_there_is_nothing_sinister.page</link><description><![CDATA[As enantiomeric compounds have become increasingly important to the pharmaceutical industry has increased, so has patent protection for them. Nicholas Tyacke and Simone Chernishev look at the first decision in Australia on the infringement and validity of an enantiomer patent.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200708/13/australias_high_court_grapples_with_the_issue_of_obviousness_again.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Australia's High Court grapples with the issue of obviousness again]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200708/13/australias_high_court_grapples_with_the_issue_of_obviousness_again.page</link><description><![CDATA[Wayne Condon explains how the High Court has stepped away from the UK view of "inventive step" - and what that means for patents.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20061215/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20061215/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: So where the bloody hell are you online?; Bad news for Google News; It's good governance - Don't overstate the commercial significance of your IP; Opposing or revoking a trade mark - important changes; Business method patents - does your invention have a physical effect or consequence?; Infringing a design: it might not be obvious, but it could be fraudulent; Technological protection measures and circumvention devices - will new laws solve the problem?;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200608/07/clayton_utz_lawyers_admired_in_asia.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz lawyers admired in Asia]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200608/07/clayton_utz_lawyers_admired_in_asia.page</link><description><![CDATA[Clayton Utz partners have been recognised as among the most admired in Asia in a guide to the region's leading commercial lawyers. Eight Clayton Utz partners have been named in Asialaw Leading Lawyers 2006, which honours the region's top legal counsel in a broad range of jurisdictions and practice areas.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20060719/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20060719/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Lara Bingle sues men's magazine - protecting personality rights in Australia; It's patently not obvious to an Aussie Rules coach; Domain names and trade marks: Words of caution from the UK High Court; Review of technological protection measures exceptions: is there an easier way?; When is a licence agreement a franchise agreement?; Name the wrong inventors, lose your patent; Shakeup in evidence preparation for patent oppositions; Trade marks and the issue of bad faith in "non-use applications": who bears the burden of proof?; Summary judgment in Australian IP cases;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/08/clayton_utz_partner_takes_on_top_ipba_role.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz partner takes on top IPBA role]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200605/08/clayton_utz_partner_takes_on_top_ipba_role.page</link><description><![CDATA[Clayton Utz partner Jim FitzSimons has officially stepped into his new role of President of the Inter-Pacific Bar Association following the association's 16th annual conference, which Mr FitzSimons describes as having been an outstanding success.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200604/06/significant_changes_proposed_to_australian_patent_law.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Significant changes proposed to Australian patent law]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200604/06/significant_changes_proposed_to_australian_patent_law.page</link><description><![CDATA[In the last week of March 2006, the Federal Government introduced the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment Bill 2006 into Parliament. As its title suggests, the Bill proposed changes to a number of areas of intellectual property law. The most significant of the proposed changes relate to Australian patent law, and it is these changes which are the focus of this alert.]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20051214/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20051214/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The Block is no Dream Home - copyright and television program formats; Does your invention "benefit Australian society as a whole" - a new test for patentability; Who owns the IP devised by a company director?; Experimenting at your peril?; A case of software "look and feel"; Crown copyright &#8220; an uncertain future; GITC version 5 - Government ICT contracting in Queensland moves to a new age;]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050902/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050902/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: When linking is infringing: the MP3s4FREE case; Was Grokster really a victory for the entertainment industry?; New Act controls workplace surveillance; Is publishing a website "doing business in Australia"?; Court says "cheese" to TV cameras - but are we any the wiser?; Copyright and implied licences - when do they arise?; Do exclusion clauses work?;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050509/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20050509/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: Big changes to ownership of sound recordings and performers' rights; Can offering products on a foreign website infringe Australian trade marks?; Who wants to be a patentee?; Update on Madrid Protocol; You paid for it - but do you own it, and can you protect your investment?;]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200503/07/clayton_utz_lawyer_calls_for_support_for_patent_law_clarity.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz lawyer calls for support for patent law clarity]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200503/07/clayton_utz_lawyer_calls_for_support_for_patent_law_clarity.page</link><description><![CDATA[Unless Australia's patent laws are changed the development of its R&D industry may be under threat - and time is running out for those who might be impacted to make their voices heard on the issue, says leading intellectual property lawyer and Clayton Utz partner Wayne Condon.]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200409/29/want_to_bag_the_companys_ip_you_just_may_get_caught_and_taken_to_the_cleaners.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Want to bag the company's IP? You just may get caught and taken to the cleaners]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200409/29/want_to_bag_the_companys_ip_you_just_may_get_caught_and_taken_to_the_cleaners.page</link><description><![CDATA[In endorsing the Deloitte Forensic recent survey that found that intellectual property theft is rampant in Australian companies, leading intellectual property lawyer Wayne Condon has warned both individuals and companies that they are under a misapprehension if they think this is an unstoppable business risk]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040914/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040914/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The FTA's impact on generic pharmaceuticals and the PBS: Much ado about nothing?; FTA shakes up copyright law; IP, tax planning, and the Uniform Capital Allowances System; Some sanity returns to IT disputes?; Australian DVD pirate gaoled; APRA's draft Prudential Standard on business continuity management for ADIs and insurers;]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/FTA_Article_Aug04.pdf</guid><title><![CDATA[The impact of the US FTA on the generic pharmaceutical industry & the PBS]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/docs/FTA_Article_Aug04.pdf</link><description><![CDATA[The Australia-US FTA was accompanied by media reports and public statements that it would cause the sky to fall on the PBS and Australian generics, but Nicholas Tyacke wonders if they were right.]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040610/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040610/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: The legality of internet pop-up ads; Harry Potter and the Order of the Federal Court; Draft standard on corporate governance and information and communication technology; How well does our patent regime protect business systems?; Be fair, bugs in software are just defects; Crown ownership of copyright under review; Internet search engines, advertising and trade marks - update; Profile: Paul Armarego;]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200406/02/clayton_utz_commits_itself_to_the_inter-pacific_bar_association.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Clayton Utz commits itself to the Inter-Pacific Bar Association]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/news/200406/02/clayton_utz_commits_itself_to_the_inter-pacific_bar_association.page</link><description><![CDATA[Australian law firm Clayton Utz has confirmed its commitment to legal practice in the Asia Pacific region with a number of partners accepting positions to serve the Inter-Pacific Bar Association.]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><guid>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040312/home.page</guid><title><![CDATA[Intellectual Property and IT Insights]]></title><link>http://www.claytonutz.com/publications/newsletters/intellectual_property_and_it_insights/20040312/home.page</link><description><![CDATA[This issue includes: New dawn for Australia&#8482;s registered designs laws; Fixing the copyright/design overlap?; &#339;Shiver Me Timbers! still infringes; Internet search engines, advertising and trade marks; Unique aspects of IT PPP projects; Quick bytes; Foreign language marks and deceptive similarity;]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>